<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to America, Mr. Singh!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/</link>
	<description>Technology, Politics and Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saim</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4209</link>
		<dc:creator>saim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4209</guid>
		<description>hello</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veneet</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4172</link>
		<dc:creator>Veneet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4172</guid>
		<description>In my view President Obama should fire Gen. Stanley McChrystal for making such remarks. Obama should not have appointed McChrystal in the first place, given what was already known of his role in covering up the killing of football star Pat Tillman and condoning the torture practices by troops under McChrystal&#039;s earlier command in Iraq.

Two months ago when McChrystal became more and more outspoken about what he considered the best approach to the Afghanistan war, policy discussions were under way in Washington to help the President make enlightened policy choices among the various views and possibilities.  Since decisions were (are?) still pending, and since McChrystal&#039;s private input was already part of the mix, he was clearly out of line in going public at so sensitive a time.

Senior generals know better than to do that; there is little doubt his outspokenness was deliberate.  McChrystal should meet the same fate as McArthur, and &quot;silently steal away.&quot;  Obama should have taken the telegenic general to the woodshed instead of inviting him to confer quietly on Air Force One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view President Obama should fire Gen. Stanley McChrystal for making such remarks. Obama should not have appointed McChrystal in the first place, given what was already known of his role in covering up the killing of football star Pat Tillman and condoning the torture practices by troops under McChrystal&#8217;s earlier command in Iraq.</p>
<p>Two months ago when McChrystal became more and more outspoken about what he considered the best approach to the Afghanistan war, policy discussions were under way in Washington to help the President make enlightened policy choices among the various views and possibilities.  Since decisions were (are?) still pending, and since McChrystal&#8217;s private input was already part of the mix, he was clearly out of line in going public at so sensitive a time.</p>
<p>Senior generals know better than to do that; there is little doubt his outspokenness was deliberate.  McChrystal should meet the same fate as McArthur, and &#8220;silently steal away.&#8221;  Obama should have taken the telegenic general to the woodshed instead of inviting him to confer quietly on Air Force One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanaz Ramchand</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanaz Ramchand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4162</guid>
		<description>Idiots !
Most of the world including Pak &amp; Bharat are sucking America&#039;s ballz !
Neither have guts to stand up for your rights !!
No point of arguing here ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiots !<br />
Most of the world including Pak &#038; Bharat are sucking America&#8217;s ballz !<br />
Neither have guts to stand up for your rights !!<br />
No point of arguing here &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizvi</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Pakistani&lt;/b&gt;: why are you cursing him? what did you not like in this article? This is very pro Pakistani. I am confused. Are you Indian agent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Pakistani</b>: why are you cursing him? what did you not like in this article? This is very pro Pakistani. I am confused. Are you Indian agent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK Gupta</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>PK Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>You terrorist Pakis SOB are wasting time. You are just jealous of India&#039;s progress and barking like street dogs at nice and shiny cars that are passing you bye. you pakis are stuck in stone age. 

America and US are very good allies. We can handle China and Pakistan is a piece of crap on the map.

Suck it up and start saying &quot;India is Our Model&quot; &quot;We want to be like India&quot; and may be you will succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You terrorist Pakis SOB are wasting time. You are just jealous of India&#8217;s progress and barking like street dogs at nice and shiny cars that are passing you bye. you pakis are stuck in stone age. </p>
<p>America and US are very good allies. We can handle China and Pakistan is a piece of crap on the map.</p>
<p>Suck it up and start saying &#8220;India is Our Model&#8221; &#8220;We want to be like India&#8221; and may be you will succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistani</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4145</guid>
		<description>GO TO HELL MALICK!! YAHOODI KI AULAAD!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO TO HELL MALICK!! YAHOODI KI AULAAD!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murtaza</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Murtaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>Indians have become more narrow-minded and intolerable of outside criticism as nationalism sentiment rises, with some of them even turning to hegemony. It can be proved by India&#039;s recent provocation on border issues with China. 

Given the country&#039;s history, hegemony is a hundred-percent result of British colonialism. Dating back to the era of British India, the country covered a vast territory including present-day India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh as well as Nepal. India took it for granted that it could continue to rule the large area when Britain ended its colonialism in South Asia. A previous victim of colonialism and hegemony started to dream about developing its own hegemony. Obsessed with such mentality, India turned a blind eye to the concessions China had repeatedly made over the disputed border issues, and refused to drop the pretentious airs when dealing with neighbors like Pakistan. 

Many Indians didn&#039;t know that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, had once said that India could not play an inferior role in the world, and it should either be a superpower or disappear. 

Although the pursuit of being a superpower is justifiable, the dream of being a superpower held by Indians appears impetuous. The dream of superpower is mingled with the thought of hegemony, which places the South Asian giant in an awkward situation and results in repeated failure. 

Throughout the history, India has constantly been under foreign rule. The essence for the rise of India lies in how to be an independent country, to learn to solve the complicated ethnic and religious issues, to protect the country from terrorist attacks, to boost economic development as well as to put more efforts on poverty alleviation. 

Additionally, the hegemony can also be harmful in terms of geopolitical environment. The expansion of India is restricted by its geographic locations. It has Himalaya Mountain to its north, a natural barrier for northward expansion; it has Pakistan to the west, a neighbor it is always at odds over the disputed border issues. 

To everyone&#039;s disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of &quot;befriend the far and attack the near&quot;. It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indians have become more narrow-minded and intolerable of outside criticism as nationalism sentiment rises, with some of them even turning to hegemony. It can be proved by India&#8217;s recent provocation on border issues with China. </p>
<p>Given the country&#8217;s history, hegemony is a hundred-percent result of British colonialism. Dating back to the era of British India, the country covered a vast territory including present-day India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh as well as Nepal. India took it for granted that it could continue to rule the large area when Britain ended its colonialism in South Asia. A previous victim of colonialism and hegemony started to dream about developing its own hegemony. Obsessed with such mentality, India turned a blind eye to the concessions China had repeatedly made over the disputed border issues, and refused to drop the pretentious airs when dealing with neighbors like Pakistan. </p>
<p>Many Indians didn&#8217;t know that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, had once said that India could not play an inferior role in the world, and it should either be a superpower or disappear. </p>
<p>Although the pursuit of being a superpower is justifiable, the dream of being a superpower held by Indians appears impetuous. The dream of superpower is mingled with the thought of hegemony, which places the South Asian giant in an awkward situation and results in repeated failure. </p>
<p>Throughout the history, India has constantly been under foreign rule. The essence for the rise of India lies in how to be an independent country, to learn to solve the complicated ethnic and religious issues, to protect the country from terrorist attacks, to boost economic development as well as to put more efforts on poverty alleviation. </p>
<p>Additionally, the hegemony can also be harmful in terms of geopolitical environment. The expansion of India is restricted by its geographic locations. It has Himalaya Mountain to its north, a natural barrier for northward expansion; it has Pakistan to the west, a neighbor it is always at odds over the disputed border issues. </p>
<p>To everyone&#8217;s disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of &#8220;befriend the far and attack the near&#8221;. It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizvi</title>
		<link>http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/welcome-to-america-mr-singh/407/comment-page-1/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/?p=407#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>India is a regional hegemony. And now it is doing America&#039;s bidding. i would expect Americans to return favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India is a regional hegemony. And now it is doing America&#8217;s bidding. i would expect Americans to return favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

